Not sure about anything else but no social media til like 16 tbh

it sucks. parents are in a position even if you don't want to expose your children to the internet/social media at too young of an age, you risk your child falling behind socially/etc.
which one is more harmful?

Yeah this also smth that i think about tbh

Like social media is f***ing awful and is harmful for adults even let alone kids

But then again social life is so much intertwined with social media and will only get worse so you really are setting them back socially

It's crayz i think our gen is gonna end up being a lot more strict bc our parents werent rly that internet savvy and rly had no idea what kinda f***ed up s*** we were seeing

No matter what you do they'll find a way to be online. The best way to counter this is to get them into activities and sports so they become more interested and engaged in what's going on irl than online. Of course I don't want them to completely shun going online so there is a balancing act here. My ideal scenario is that they go online mainly to do productive things.

im gonna form a parenting group where we all pretend the internet doesnt exist to our kids and they have go collect bugs to pass the time

this film

Y'all sound bout old as hell talking bout not allowing kids to use the internet