Reply
  • Apr 21, 2020
    GIO GIO

    Vast majority of "creatives" contribute little to society, if that's all they do. The most creative minds in turn produce content that is useful, like well known artists do, or people like steve jobs who use their creativity to create products that are beneficial to many people. Just because you can make some cool cover art or paint something dope doesn't mean people should care. Create something worth caring about and people will care. And that is reflected in society

  • Apr 21, 2020

    I feel like only lazy niggas make topics like this.

    This is s*** is a case by case basis. When you say creative, youre deadass talking about niggas fingerpainting on t shirts.

    Not everyone could or should be an artist. Youre selling something that cant exactly be replicated.

    Schools can bolster creative thinking as well, it depends what kind of schools you go to and the resources at hand. Schools have whole ass band classes, art classes, etc etc. They should put in more funding depending on where you are but its cap acting like these niggas are ignored by everyone.

    And "creative thinking", the way people who arent fingerpainting ass niggas think about it. Is useful in all fields of learning.

    There arent 1 million Kanye's out there

  • Apr 21, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Also why are you comparing artist to Scientist.

    Scientist get funding easier because Scientific funding is sponsored st universities. If you wanna draw a logo on your painting or host it at a school, Im sure theyll subsidize the cost but maybe you should make a name for yourself first.
    Schools need to go through an entire process just to get research through.

    This comparison is noise, you might as well compare scientist to entertainers.

  • Apr 22, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    Also why are you comparing artist to Scientist.

    Scientist get funding easier because Scientific funding is sponsored st universities. If you wanna draw a logo on your painting or host it at a school, Im sure theyll subsidize the cost but maybe you should make a name for yourself first.
    Schools need to go through an entire process just to get research through.

    This comparison is noise, you might as well compare scientist to entertainers.

    art and science are the two sides of education, its even reflected in the very titles of the bachelors degree
    can you imagine if scientists were just expected to conduct experiments in their house, and if they cant make it they “didnt grind enough”?
    or had to sign a 360 deal?
    art doesnt help as directly as science, but it makes a difference. imagine how crazy quarantine would be rn if people wouldnt stay occupied with art (netflix, video games). art and science help us through this in tandem.
    you can def make that comparison. there are scientists who are entertainers (bill nye; stephen hawking) and artists who conduct their s*** very scientifically (video game developers)

  • Apr 22, 2020
    ongod

    art and science are the two sides of education, its even reflected in the very titles of the bachelors degree
    can you imagine if scientists were just expected to conduct experiments in their house, and if they cant make it they “didnt grind enough”?
    or had to sign a 360 deal?
    art doesnt help as directly as science, but it makes a difference. imagine how crazy quarantine would be rn if people wouldnt stay occupied with art (netflix, video games). art and science help us through this in tandem.
    you can def make that comparison. there are scientists who are entertainers (bill nye; stephen hawking) and artists who conduct their s*** very scientifically (video game developers)

    Nigga what is this pseud s***. You dont compare them because theyre different fields of work.
    They fund scientifice reseaech because this is how we make breakthroughs so that people survive and so we can innovate technology.

    People also fund artistic endeavors on a case by case basis. Like idg the argument? If you want schools to fund art programs. Sure, but like this scientist meme s*** is unnecessary. It doesnt help your case, it just makes you look like a tryhard trying to couple art and science together to beg for funding.

    Art is important because it brings entertainment to peoples lives. Point blank, you dont need a story about sad scientists nigga tf. The average laborer loves watching shows and going to the bar. The bar owner kicks back on the couch with a corner of hooch and watches TV, which utilize actors, bands, writers, etc.
    That is the argument, you can make it without these weird scientist mentions.

  • isn't entrepreneurship creativity cause you're creating a unique product or service while taking inspiration from existing companies

  • This guy really just told us to not think logically