Or does it depend? Mostly I separate them except for extreme cases of f***ery.

R Kelly for example has a lot of raunchy s***songs that he could've very easily been thinking about underage girls when he wrote them so it feels kinda weird still playing his stuff like that.

Ill still listen to someone like CB tho. He made mistakes as a young kid and grew from them.

I do. R Kelly has undeniable bangers

No

Why not? and Where do you draw the line?

Are you not gonna watch pulp fiction because its a Miramax movie?

It’s definitely a case by case basis

So many artists have done f***ed up s*** so it’s be hard to cancel every artist

But at the same time there are some artists I refuse to fw

if the art is about the incident then no

This too

Because sometimes my perception of an artist makes me enjoy their art more.

No artist I enjoy has ever do something that makes me stop enjoying their art.

What did Miramax do?

Depends

Miramax was founded by Harvey Weinstein and his brother

it depends how much previous connection i have to the art and it's subject matter

a lot of the times i'll still just try to enjoy the old stuff and act like that person doesn't exist anymore in current times

yes

In general yeah, but don’t listen to anyone who’s been labeled “problematic” yet.

Tarantino is the artist tho.

It depends

There is no separating the art and artist when the art is so personal like Daystar...
Ignition is not about pissing on lil girls

Or is it?

depends on the artist and what they did

no

Didnt listen to Tory before and Im not gonna start now

Thread isn't about Tory

Depends