There is a 'conspiracy', but it doesn't have much to do with race. Western whites are not reproducing enough to sustain the infinite growth that capitalism requires, so the plutocrats push to import the country with new blood to stall a shrinking market.
On one hand, I understand the dissonance that white people feel: leagues of out-group demographics that don't respect them are coming in, voting for their own interests, and changing the culture of the country.
On the other hand, that's the inevitable consequence of liberal capitalism. Your people, your culture, your religion, your lifestyle -- it's all only as important as its potential for profit. America was built off of exploitation and selling out to make a dollar: the diminishing white demographic is just the chickens coming home to roost.
Then why don't white people just become communist?
Then why don't white people just become communist?
Because communism is cultural Marxism, or something like that.
I don't know that communism is the solution, but it's definitely not shooting at random people just like shooting at random white Afrikaners doesn't actually help black South Africans.
IMO, power needs to be divided up to a far greater extent so that fewer people feel disenfranchised. Let communities of white people, black people, native people, etc. govern themselves autonomously. There's zero reason why the black community should have to exist under the thumb of a white authority, or vice versa. I'm not suggesting segregation, either -- I'm suggesting voluntarism, where people can freely create and disband communities of governance. So if people want mixed and diverse communities, they can have them. If blacks, whites, or whoever, want to cluster with people that are like them, then they can.
Then why don't white people just become communist?
why doesn't a king step down from his position in times of political turmoil?
it is in the interest of the ruling class to preserve power, the way things are organized
Because communism is cultural Marxism, or something like that.
I don't know that communism is the solution, but it's definitely not shooting at random people just like shooting at random white Afrikaners doesn't actually help black South Africans.
IMO, power needs to be divided up to a far greater extent so that fewer people feel disenfranchised. Let communities of white people, black people, native people, etc. govern themselves autonomously. There's zero reason why the black community should have to exist under the thumb of a white authority, or vice versa. I'm not suggesting segregation, either -- I'm suggesting voluntarism, where people can freely create and disband communities of governance. So if people want mixed and diverse communities, they can have them. If blacks, whites, or whoever, want to cluster with people that are like them, then they can.
Yeah but what that becomes, historically, is white people burning down the black towns, and then we just whitewash history until the next generations forget about it.
There is a 'conspiracy', but it doesn't have much to do with race. Western whites are not reproducing enough to sustain the infinite growth that capitalism requires, so the plutocrats push to import the country with new blood to stall a shrinking market.
On one hand, I understand the dissonance that white people feel: leagues of out-group demographics that don't respect them are coming in, voting for their own interests, and changing the culture of the country.
On the other hand, that's the inevitable consequence of liberal capitalism. Your people, your culture, your religion, your lifestyle -- it's all only as important as its potential for profit. America was built off of exploitation and selling out to make a dollar: the diminishing white demographic is just the chickens coming home to roost.
I really like this take though, quite possibly a method to break through the cognitive dissonance to conspiracy theorists. It isn’t attacking them, just explaining what the f*** is happening and what they should actually be mad at.
I really like this take though, quite possibly a method to break through the cognitive dissonance to conspiracy theorists. It isn’t attacking them, just explaining what the f*** is happening and what they should actually be mad at.
I think it's funny -- people are quick to dismiss the 'replacement theory' wholesale, and in the same breath cheer on the falling white population and demand white people accept becoming a minority. Like yeah... that's their whole argument, and the statistics appear to be on their side.
There just isn't any reason to believe that the white people that run congress and the white lobbyists that bribe them are specifically targeting whites for elimination. These people only care about money and how to pad the numbers to keep the public faithful to the system. If that means importing 100 million Central Americans to keep cooking the books, they will do it. If that means importing a bunch of white Swiss people, they will do it -- it just so happens that Europe is on the other side of the planet, and most Europeans have no economic motivation to move to the US.
This is America. If you ain't making rich people richer, you don't matter. Nothing personal
but if youre not a psycho you can see that it's just just the reality of white not even being a very real thing, and that once "white" blood is mixed with another race that bloodline will never really be "white" again. someone smarter than me can explain how that stems from american racism
"race purity" and things like one drop rule makes no sense to me. if you are white, you are white.
You rly have no clue what you're talking about lmao
African chattle slavery and the subsequent invention of race and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
There is absolutely nothing real (ie genetic) about race
If you are gonna classify human populations by genetic similarities, which is dumb anyway, you would have more "races" among people from sub-Saharan Africa than the rest of the world combined, yet we're all just labeled "black"
Race is not real
There is absolutely nothing real (ie genetic) about race
If you are gonna classify human populations by genetic similarities, which is dumb anyway, you would have more "races" among people from sub-Saharan Africa than the rest of the world combined, yet we're all just labeled "black"
Race is not real
!https://youtu.be/q7sxTnWeQ8sAgreed, but
which is dumb anyway
why?
Turkish people are often seen as white in the US
Not at all in europe
Who was deemed to be "white" changed over time
Even now people still disagree
Try to define what the white race is, there is no qualification based on anything real
Agreed, but
which is dumb anyway
why?
Because the differences between these populations are miniscule compared to the differences between individuals except for some medical conditions like sickle cell or whatever
Because the differences between these populations are miniscule compared to the differences between individuals except for some medical conditions like sickle cell or whatever
oh, that was my reasoning for why it would be wise, because medical conditions such as diseases; things like diet, lifestyle etc.
oh, that was my reasoning for why it would be wise, because medical conditions such as diseases; things like diet, lifestyle etc.
For most things it's still very inconsequential
In medicine it might sometimes be useful tho for sure
But there's really no reason for it besides that
For most things it's still very inconsequential
In medicine it might sometimes be useful tho for sure
But there's really no reason for it besides that
What about history such as identifying the identity of ancient cultures?
fun fact replacement theory was invented by a gay leftist
What about history such as identifying the identity of ancient cultures?
Well then you identify those cultures, not the genetic similarities
It can be done for some academic purposes in anthropology or whatever
Im not saying it should never be done or anything lol, it's just not nearly as useful or meaningful as people think, and the way race is understood was only conceived of for the purpose of dehumanizing certain "races" to exploit them more than the "white race"
You rly have no clue what you're talking about lmao
so you support one drop rule and "race purity"?
Well then you identify those cultures, not the genetic similarities
It can be done for some academic purposes in anthropology or whatever
Im not saying it should never be done or anything lol, it's just not nearly as useful or meaningful as people think, and the way race is understood was only conceived of for the purpose of dehumanizing certain "races" to exploit them more than the "white race"
the way race is understood was only conceived of for the purpose of dehumanizing certain "races" to exploit them more than the "white race"
I agree 100%
Well then you identify those cultures, not the genetic similarities
Isn't genealogy apart of identifying cultures? And don't you think it's important to know where said culture evolved into and where it currently remains?
It can be done for some academic purposes in anthropology or whatever
How about for people's personal/individual curiosity and/or people who feel that it is needed to sustain said culture/s?
the way race is understood was only conceived of for the purpose of dehumanizing certain "races" to exploit them more than the "white race"
I agree 100%
Well then you identify those cultures, not the genetic similarities
Isn't genealogy apart of identifying cultures? And don't you think it's important to know where said culture evolved into and where it currently remains?
It can be done for some academic purposes in anthropology or whatever
How about for people's personal/individual curiosity and/or people who feel that it is needed to sustain said culture/s?
I think you're misunderstanding what i'm saying, if you agree w that first statement we're pretty much on the same page
I'm just saying there's no reason to identify people on genetic similarities besides academic and medical reasons
Genealogy is an individual/familial thing, not population wide, and cultural similarities are seperate from genetic similarities. It's not like chinese people are culturally more similar to english people just because they have more in common genetically
I think you're misunderstanding what i'm saying, if you agree w that first statement we're pretty much on the same page
I'm just saying there's no reason to identify people on genetic similarities besides academic and medical reasons
Genealogy is an individual/familial thing, not population wide, and cultural similarities are seperate from genetic similarities. It's not like chinese people are culturally more similar to english people just because they have more in common genetically
oh, I see. My bad
Turkish people are often seen as white in the US
Not at all in europe
Who was deemed to be "white" changed over time
Even now people still disagree
Try to define what the white race is, there is no qualification based on anything real
Then you got people in the US who will swear people from Spain, Italy, and Greece are non-white
I guess it's just far too tempting for people to generalize millions of individuals with baseless, monolithic labels. Sad.