I think travis bickle needs his own separate thread
This thread was always about talking to each other as muslims our mistakes, good deeds, and just general convo
He's coming into this thread and saying theres only one specific way to be a muslim and everyone else is a "dog" lol
Ruining the thread and he has a complete lack of self aweness too
It was narrated from Muâaawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) that he said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) stood among us and said: âThose who came before you of the people of the Book split into seventy-two sects, and this ummah will split into seventy-three: seventy-two in Hell and one in Paradise, and that is the jamaaâah (main body of Muslims).â
You salafi?
trying my best to be, iâm not worthy of carrying that title
Off the authority and ruling from Sheikh Ibn Baaz rahimullah:
What is the ruling on taâwil (allegorical interpretation) of Allahâs Attributes?
A: Taâwil of Allahâs Attributes is Munkar (disapproved of by Islamic law and Muslims of sound intellect) and is not permissible. In fact, it is obligatory for the Attributes of Allah to be accepted as stated, according to their apparent meaning that befits Allahâs Glory (Glorified and Exalted be He), without Tahrif (distortion of the meaning), Taâtil (denial), Takyif (describing how), or Tamthil (likening His Attributes to those of His Creation).
Allah (Glorified and Exalted be He) informs us of His Names and Attributes, saying: There is nothing like Him; and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer. As Muslims, we have to accept them as they are, according to the opinion of Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jamaâah (those adhering to the Sunnah and the Muslim main body). They advise Muslims to acknowledge Allahâs Attributes as they are, without Takyif. They should be accepted as they are, without Tahrif, Taâwil or Takyif. Muslims should attest to Allahâs Attributes as they were revealed, according to their apparent meaning and as befits Allahâs Stature, without any Takyif or Tamthil. For example, Allah says: The Most Gracious (AllĂąh) rose over (IstawĂą) the (Mighty) Throne (in a manner that suits His Majesty). In this Ayah (Qurâanic verse) and similar ones, we are told that Allah rose over the Throne, which is in a manner that suits His Majesty and Grandeur, and the manner of this cannot be compared to that of any of His creatures. The scholars who follow Al-Haqq (the Truth) see this as signifying His Highness and Exaltedness.
The same applies to other Attributes of Allah, such as His Eye, Hearing, Sight, Hand, Foot, and other Attributes that are authentically reported in Nas (Islamic texts from the Qurâan or the Sunnah). All of these Attributes are as befits Allah (Exalted be He) and are not comparable to those of any creature. This is the opinion of the scholars from among the Sahabah (Companions of the Prophet) and those after them from the Imams (initiators of a School of Jurisprudence), such as Al-Awzaây, Al-Thawry, Malik, Abu Hanifah, Ahmad, Ishaq, and other Muslim Imams (may Allah be merciful to them all).
Allah says, when relating the story of Prophet Nuh (Noah, peace be upon him): And We carried him on a (ship) made of planks and nails, Floating under Our Eyes He (Glorified be He) also says when relating the story of Prophet Musa (Moses, peace be upon him): in order that you may be brought up under My Eye. Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jamaâah explained the Ayah where Allah says: Floating under Our Eyes by saying that He (Glorified be He) let the ship float under His Care until it rested on Mount Judy. Similarly, when Allah says: in order that you may be brought up under My Eye. they say that He (Glorified be He) means that Musa (peace be upon him) will be brought up under His Care and with His Guidance to those in charge of raising him.
In the same manner, when Allah (may He be Praised) says to the Prophet (peace be upon him): So wait patiently (O Muhammad Sallalaahu Alahi wa Sallam) for the Decision of your Lord, for verily, you are under Our Eyes He means that Muhammad is under Allahâs Protection and Care. These interpretations do not fall under the prohibited Taâwil; rather, they fall under Tafsir (explanation/exegesis) well-known in the Arabic language and its styles.
A third example is in a Hadith Qudsy (Revelation from Allah in the Prophetâs words)where Allah (Glorified be He) says: âAnyone who comes nearer to Me by a span, I come nearer to them by a cubit; and anyone who comes nearer to Me by a cubit, I come nearer to them by a fathom; and anyone who comes to Me walking, I come to them running.â These words are accepted as they were revealed from Allah (may He be Praised and Exalted) without Tahrif, Takyif, or Tamthil, but in the way that is wanted by Allah. The same thing can be said about Allahâs Descent at the end of the night, His Hearing, Sight, Anger, Pleasure, Laughter, Happiness, and other authentically established Attributes of Allah. They all must be accepted as they were revealed, in the manner that befits Allah, without any Takyif, Tahrif, Taâtil or Tamthil. This is because Allah says: There is nothing like Him; and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer. and many Ayahs to the same effect.
As for Taâwil of Allahâs Attributes and diverging them from apparent meaning, this is the methodology of those who follow Bidâah (innovations in religion), such as the Jahmiyyah and the Muâtazilah (deviant Islamic sects), and those who follow them. Their Madh-habs (Schools of Jurisprudence) are Batil (null and void), and have been denied and renounced by Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jamaâah, who have warned people against their promoters. And Allah is the Grantor of success.
you missed the whole point of what i was saying. me and you could sit next to eachother in the same room reading the same text (whether that be the Quran or something else) and we could both take something completely different from said text. I could send my christian grandmother a copy of the Quran in the mail and she could see it in a different light than me or you. we all are individuals and we all react to and interpret things differently from the next person.
you missed the whole point of what i was saying. me and you could sit next to eachother in the same room reading the same text (whether that be the Quran or something else) and we could both take something completely different from said text. I could send my christian grandmother a copy of the Quran in the mail and she could see it in a different light than me or you. we all are individuals and we all react to and interpret things differently from the next person.
No, I understood and iâm telling you there are set guidelines for Qurâanic exegesis
He is the One Who has revealed to you ËčO ProphetËș the Book, of which some verses are preciseâthey are the foundation of the Bookâwhile others are elusive. Those with deviant hearts follow the elusive verses seeking Ëčto spreadËș doubt through their ËčfalseËș interpretationsâbut none grasps their ËčfullËș meaning except Allah. As for those well-grounded in knowledge, they say, âWe believe in this ËčQuranËșâit is all from our Lord.â But none will be mindful Ëčof thisËș except people of reason.
Aal-E-Imran, Ayah 7
that majin guy started it. Thread was just talking about normal stuff
then he just HAD to bring up shias
i knew it was only going one way after that
Also the comparisons he made added so much fuel to the fire
i was just trying to raise awareness for an important topic
No, I understood and iâm telling you there are set guidelines for Qurâanic exegesis
He is the One Who has revealed to you ËčO ProphetËș the Book, of which some verses are preciseâthey are the foundation of the Bookâwhile others are elusive. Those with deviant hearts follow the elusive verses seeking Ëčto spreadËș doubt through their ËčfalseËș interpretationsâbut none grasps their ËčfullËș meaning except Allah. As for those well-grounded in knowledge, they say, âWe believe in this ËčQuranËșâit is all from our Lord.â But none will be mindful Ëčof thisËș except people of reason.
Aal-E-Imran, Ayah 7
exegesis in the islamic sense is used to is basically a method used to rule out contradictory rulings based on revelation lmao what are you even talking about.
trying my best to be, iâm not worthy of carrying that title
this and you recommending one of Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhabs works explains everything.
not even gonna take you seriously.
this and you recommending one of Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhabs works explains everything.
not even gonna take you seriously.
LMAOOO
exegesis in the islamic sense is used to is basically a method used to rule out contradictory rulings based on revelation lmao what are you even talking about.
yeahhh no. I think you need to go understand taâwil vs tafsir
Is this the abridged version of Pinterest Qurâan?
Hereâs the actual ayah 33 from Surah al Maidah:
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is death, crucifixion, cutting off their hands and feet on opposite sides, or exile from the land. This ËčpenaltyËș is a disgrace for them in this world, and they will suffer a tremendous punishment in the Hereafter. (33)
Is this the abridged version of Pinterest Qurâan?
Hereâs the actual ayah 33 from Surah al Maidah:
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is death, crucifixion, cutting off their hands and feet on opposite sides, or exile from the land. This ËčpenaltyËș is a disgrace for them in this world, and they will suffer a tremendous punishment in the Hereafter. (33)
its verse 32, the verse in the image is wrong. shouldnt you know it better if you claim yourself righteous and scholarly?
For this reason, We decreed for the children of IsrÄâÄ«l that whoever kills a person not in retaliation for a person killed, nor (as a punishment) for spreading disorder on the earth, is as if he has killed the whole of humankind, and whoever saves the life of a person is as if he has saved the life of the whole of humankind. Certainly, Our messengers have come to them with clear signs. Then, after all that, many of them are there to commit excesses on the earth. (5:32)
its verse 32, the verse in the image is wrong. shouldnt you know it better if you claim yourself righteous and scholarly?
For this reason, We decreed for the children of IsrÄâÄ«l that whoever kills a person not in retaliation for a person killed, nor (as a punishment) for spreading disorder on the earth, is as if he has killed the whole of humankind, and whoever saves the life of a person is as if he has saved the life of the whole of humankind. Certainly, Our messengers have come to them with clear signs. Then, after all that, many of them are there to commit excesses on the earth. (5:32)
never claimed to be righteous or scholarly even once, nor did i deny that translation isnât from any ayah in the Qurâan lol.
Nonetheless, a better question is if it is wrong why post it? Also, hereâs the tafsir of the ayah
its verse 32, the verse in the image is wrong. shouldnt you know it better if you claim yourself righteous and scholarly?
For this reason, We decreed for the children of IsrÄâÄ«l that whoever kills a person not in retaliation for a person killed, nor (as a punishment) for spreading disorder on the earth, is as if he has killed the whole of humankind, and whoever saves the life of a person is as if he has saved the life of the whole of humankind. Certainly, Our messengers have come to them with clear signs. Then, after all that, many of them are there to commit excesses on the earth. (5:32)
That "spreading disorder" part leaves A LOT of room for interpretation. Our radical friend above would probably say that includes shias, homosexuals, people who draw the prophet, etc.
That "spreading disorder" part leaves A LOT of room for interpretation. Our radical friend above would probably say that includes shias, homosexuals, people who draw the prophet, etc.
Thereâs no room for interpretation. The tafsir covers all the meanings we need regarding the ayat
....and do you understand the heresy of the views youâre blatantly putting forth?
homosexuality is forbidden in Islam
the kufri doctrine of the Shia is a complete contradiction of the Qurâan
blasphemy is included as an act which proposes hadd as per the Qurâan
Thereâs no room for interpretation. The tafsir covers all the meanings we need regarding the ayat
....and do you understand the heresy of the views youâre blatantly putting forth?
homosexuality is forbidden in Islam
the kufri doctrine of the Shia is a complete contradiction of the Qurâan
blasphemy is included as an act which proposes hadd as per the Qurâan
What is your problem if people donât agree with your opinion?
This is the problem with salafis. This unhealthy obsession with bending people to your way of thinking.
You wonât accountable to our sins, neither will we be accountable to yours.
So please stop proselytizing.
What is your problem if people donât agree with your opinion?
This is the problem with salafis. This unhealthy obsession with bending people to your way of thinking.
You wonât accountable to our sins, neither will we be accountable to yours.
So please stop proselytizing.
do you know what constitutes an opinion in the deen?
I can tell you for a fact there are no ikhtilaf on these matters that are clear in the Qurâan and Sunnah by any âulema unless they were heretics.
Enjoining good and forbidding evil is indeed one of the most gracious acts of the Sunnah.
as far as bringing the title of âSalafiâ into this, iâd like for you to define salafi.