Reply
  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Sir Swagalot

    i love these kinds of discussions

    i agree 100%. you can be the flashiest guitar player ever, but that doesn't equate to you being an artist. that's why you see mfs like Stevie, MJ, and Prince being brought up as the GOATs because they were able to be both insanely talented and creative

    exactly, this is why i personally think prince is the greatest to ever do it

    he literally was a seamless blend of multi instrumentalist, music knowledge, creativity, boundary pusher and an absolutely phenomenal voice

    literally no one else did it like him

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    I think you can have talent without creativity, but I don’t think you can have creativity without talent.

    For example, Charlie Puth has talent, but he’s not very creative.

    But you can’t really name a successful musician that is creative without also being talented, because I think being creative is a talent in and of itself

    i agree but would alter this slightly to say that you can have creativity without the talent, however in order to realize your ideas into medium, be it music, paintings or whatever, you need some talent.

    technology has opened the doors for a lot of people who might not have so much talent but have great ideas. things like autotune and whatnot allow creatives to bypass some of the talent that might have previously been necessary

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    thotty2hottie

    i agree but would alter this slightly to say that you can have creativity without the talent, however in order to realize your ideas into medium, be it music, paintings or whatever, you need some talent.

    technology has opened the doors for a lot of people who might not have so much talent but have great ideas. things like autotune and whatnot allow creatives to bypass some of the talent that might have previously been necessary

    Do you consider creativity itself a talent? Or are you thinking more of technical skill/knowledge?

  • Dec 2, 2022
    shaleirose

    Exactly, this the best thread I seen in a minute

    Shoutout OP

    glad you like it

  • Dec 2, 2022
    X7JQ9L2MF4A8Z

    exactly, this is why i personally think prince is the greatest to ever do it

    he literally was a seamless blend of multi instrumentalist, music knowledge, creativity, boundary pusher and an absolutely phenomenal voice

    literally no one else did it like him

    he'll forever be my favorite artist of all-time how the f*** can somebody switch up their sound from album to album in a short amount of time with virtually minimal contributions from outsiders? how? HOW?

  • Dec 2, 2022
    shaleirose

    Do you consider creativity itself a talent? Or are you thinking more of technical skill/knowledge?

    i personally consider creativity to be separate from talent. but i can see why people would think it's a talent

    it comes down just to how you want to define those terms i guess

    for me talent = technical skill/knowledge

    creativity = capacity to be original

    a really talented person with no creativity is just gonna make really good copies of things that already exist

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    4 replies
    shaleirose

    I think you can have talent without creativity, but I don’t think you can have creativity without talent.

    For example, Charlie Puth has talent, but he’s not very creative.

    But you can’t really name a successful musician that is creative without also being talented, because I think being creative is a talent in and of itself

    Out of curiosity, is there even a way to develop your creativity?

    Do artists like Charlie Puth just need to experiment more and test out what works for them/resonates with people more?

    Also, how are you basing someone’s creativity? Is it their impact, how many people enjoy their work, a combination, or something else?

  • Dec 2, 2022
    designing

    Out of curiosity, is there even a way to develop your creativity?

    Do artists like Charlie Puth just need to experiment more and test out what works for them/resonates with people more?

    Also, how are you basing someone’s creativity? Is it their impact, how many people enjoy their work, a combination, or something else?

    some great questions here.

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    designing

    Out of curiosity, is there even a way to develop your creativity?

    Do artists like Charlie Puth just need to experiment more and test out what works for them/resonates with people more?

    Also, how are you basing someone’s creativity? Is it their impact, how many people enjoy their work, a combination, or something else?

    creativity comes from inspiration. if you're not inspired, you're gonna put out a mediocre record

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Sir Swagalot

    creativity comes from inspiration. if you're not inspired, you're gonna put out a mediocre record

    Hmm, but can’t you argue most (if not all really) artists are inspired by something and they produced what they felt at the time?

    Yet, some artists’ works seem repeatably “bad”, even though they enjoy and are possibly trying new things

  • Dec 2, 2022
    shaleirose

    Also this discussion of talent vs. creativity is a big reason why I always say Abel > Bruno whenever that topic is brought up.

    Bruno has all the talent in the world, but I don’t think he’s that creative with his gifts.

    The Weeknd, on the other hand, isn’t the most technically gifted singer in the world and can’t play as many instruments as Bruno can, but he’s super creative with his approach.

    This is why, to me at least, Bruno revitalizing old styles comes off as a cover band sorta thing, but when Abel does it he puts his own unique identity into it and injects new life into whatever sound he’s bringing back

    Yeppppo

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    designing

    Out of curiosity, is there even a way to develop your creativity?

    Do artists like Charlie Puth just need to experiment more and test out what works for them/resonates with people more?

    Also, how are you basing someone’s creativity? Is it their impact, how many people enjoy their work, a combination, or something else?

    I think creativity its’ basic level is the ability & willingness to deviate from the standard and push yourself to try things you haven’t before.

    It can manifest in several different ways, but I think it always boils down to challenging yourself with each record.

    For instance, on The 1975’s new album Matty Healy challenged himself to incorporate the exact same guitar rhythm into most of the songs but have it fit each respective song in a unique way:

    Charlie Puth lacks creativity because he never goes outside the box of cookie cutter formulaic Top 40 music, and there’s no originality/personality in his music whatsoever.
    His songs sound like templates for other, more interesting pop acts.

    Creativity doesn’t always have to be something super avant-garde and experimental, it can be something as simple as what Matty & Co. did on their new record

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    designing

    Hmm, but can’t you argue most (if not all really) artists are inspired by something and they produced what they felt at the time?

    Yet, some artists’ works seem repeatably “bad”, even though they enjoy and are possibly trying new things

    not necessarily. there's many artists who put out s*** because they're forced to from their labels. not to mention if you're an artist who tours all the time and are burnt out from that lifestyle, you still gotta make that follow-up to stay relevant. it's not as bad as it was before thanks to the internet, but we've seen it time and time again over music history.

    i agree with the 2nd point. sometimes an artist is inspired to take a risk and it ends up being seen as a failure. but at that point you can't deny the artist's creativity, because they took that risk and were passionate about what they made.

    take Speedin Bullet 2 Heaven for example: it's hated by a majority of people but you can't deny that Cudi tried and had a vision for that project

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    designing

    Out of curiosity, is there even a way to develop your creativity?

    Do artists like Charlie Puth just need to experiment more and test out what works for them/resonates with people more?

    Also, how are you basing someone’s creativity? Is it their impact, how many people enjoy their work, a combination, or something else?

    I feel like being creative is a natural gift that comes from within, not even to be cliche. You can’t really teach someone how to be creative. You just sorta have it. It can be developed through your perspective of what you enjoyed as a kid to pre teen etc. it really just comes down to the person. Every creative lietrally cannot answer this question. It’s just in them. You can obviously add taste and develop and better your self creative wise with studying the greats within and outside of art/your craft

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    I think creativity its’ basic level is the ability & willingness to deviate from the standard and push yourself to try things you haven’t before.

    It can manifest in several different ways, but I think it always boils down to challenging yourself with each record.

    For instance, on The 1975’s new album Matty Healy challenged himself to incorporate the exact same guitar rhythm into most of the songs but have it fit each respective song in a unique way:

    https://twitter.com/1975prod/status/1588168478821068801

    Charlie Puth lacks creativity because he never goes outside the box of cookie cutter formulaic Top 40 music, and there’s no originality/personality in his music whatsoever.
    His songs sound like templates for other, more interesting pop acts.

    Creativity doesn’t always have to be something super avant-garde and experimental, it can be something as simple as what Matty & Co. did on their new record

    Solid points and totally agree.

    I guess it really comes down to whether the artist is willing to venture into the unknown (so to speak) or not.

    Need to check the 1975, never listened to them, but you got me curious

  • Dec 2, 2022
    designing

    Solid points and totally agree.

    I guess it really comes down to whether the artist is willing to venture into the unknown (so to speak) or not.

    Need to check the 1975, never listened to them, but you got me curious

    They’re my favorite band, and I as well as several other posters on here think they’re the best band of the 2010s

    They’ve truly gotten better and better with each album

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Sir Swagalot

    not necessarily. there's many artists who put out s*** because they're forced to from their labels. not to mention if you're an artist who tours all the time and are burnt out from that lifestyle, you still gotta make that follow-up to stay relevant. it's not as bad as it was before thanks to the internet, but we've seen it time and time again over music history.

    i agree with the 2nd point. sometimes an artist is inspired to take a risk and it ends up being seen as a failure. but at that point you can't deny the artist's creativity, because they took that risk and were passionate about what they made.

    take Speedin Bullet 2 Heaven for example: it's hated by a majority of people but you can't deny that Cudi tried and had a vision for that project

    You’re right. Sometimes they have to put some scraps together due to the nature of their contract or whatnot.

    At that point, should artists delay what they’re working on though (if no set timetable)?

    I was actually thinking of SB2H too lol. Good example of doing something different, even if the general reception isn’t there. But if you’re always thinking about the audience, are you truly an artist then?

  • Dec 2, 2022
    rayray

    I feel like being creative is a natural gift that comes from within, not even to be cliche. You can’t really teach someone how to be creative. You just sorta have it. It can be developed through your perspective of what you enjoyed as a kid to pre teen etc. it really just comes down to the person. Every creative lietrally cannot answer this question. It’s just in them. You can obviously add taste and develop and better your self creative wise with studying the greats within and outside of art/your craft

    I feel like everyone has creativity to an extent though. It’s just a matter of expressing it without holding back.

    Outside of music, I think everyone adds something to whatever space they’re in for work or their hobbies. Just a matter of using your influences to help shape some of your early thoughts

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    3 replies

    Pretentious ass thread.

    Calling artists uncreative or untalented based on your taste while they have millions of fans who fw them is some braindead take. The music just not for you and move on.

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    X7JQ9L2MF4A8Z

    what the f*** is this yo

    The guy's an actual genius theory-wise, no joke, the stuff he does with harmony in his tracks is amazing from a technical standpoint, but the songs all suck ass

    The album that was from was nominated for AOTY at the 2021 Grammys btw, he also produced on the new Stormzy album, he has this bizarre level of industry clout because he's friends with Quincy Jones, at the same time tho he genuinely seems like a nice guy, I don't outright hate him but his stuff epitomises what I dislike about theory-nerd music

  • Dec 2, 2022

    I agree w u op

    An artist like Travis (who is talented) really wins because of his creativity and ideas over his talent

    Same w artist like Ye, Frank, Tyler etc

    But I feel like artist like Drake, Kendrick, Cole prevail because of their talent more than creativity

    But both types of artist are equally valid and all have talent and creativity

    Creativity is a talent tbh

    But not all talented people are creative

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    designing

    You’re right. Sometimes they have to put some scraps together due to the nature of their contract or whatnot.

    At that point, should artists delay what they’re working on though (if no set timetable)?

    I was actually thinking of SB2H too lol. Good example of doing something different, even if the general reception isn’t there. But if you’re always thinking about the audience, are you truly an artist then?

    i definitely think artists should delay their project if their heart is not in it. if you rush an album, you risk the chance of putting out a subpar project. but some artists don't give a s*** sadly, and they'll just put out a project for the money

    i think if you want to cater towards an audience, you need to have some sort of balance so that it wont compromise your creativity.

    this is a random ass example, but the Black Album by Metallica is an album that comes to mind whenever i think of s*** like this. they were able to make radio friendly music without stripping away what made them great in the first place

  • Dec 2, 2022
    Sir Swagalot

    i definitely think artists should delay their project if their heart is not in it. if you rush an album, you risk the chance of putting out a subpar project. but some artists don't give a s*** sadly, and they'll just put out a project for the money

    i think if you want to cater towards an audience, you need to have some sort of balance so that it wont compromise your creativity.

    this is a random ass example, but the Black Album by Metallica is an album that comes to mind whenever i think of s*** like this. they were able to make radio friendly music without stripping away what made them great in the first place

    Yeah, pushing random singles, EPs, or LPs just to get paid is a sad reality for some artists. I’ll be honest and say I didn’t really think about that, but some just need the money or to pay off their advance as quickly as possible.

    And yeah, definitely need to consider the audience if you want your work to be received well. Just don’t make too many compromises.

    Ngl, haven’t listened to Metallica at all , but might check out that album now that you mention it

  • Dec 2, 2022
    1887

    Pretentious ass thread.

    Calling artists uncreative or untalented based on your taste while they have millions of fans who fw them is some braindead take. The music just not for you and move on.

    what you are saying is just because lots of people like something, that makes it creative?

    i just don't agree.

  • Dec 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Fries

    The guy's an actual genius theory-wise, no joke, the stuff he does with harmony in his tracks is amazing from a technical standpoint, but the songs all suck ass

    The album that was from was nominated for AOTY at the 2021 Grammys btw, he also produced on the new Stormzy album, he has this bizarre level of industry clout because he's friends with Quincy Jones, at the same time tho he genuinely seems like a nice guy, I don't outright hate him but his stuff epitomises what I dislike about theory-nerd music

    His music theory knowledge is kind of nuts, but I’ve heard that anyone who studies music at a renowned school or goes to a conservatory for some time can pretty much do what he does.

    He’s just good at explaining and discussing it with the public