Me: “this character is not nice and The actor who plays him irl isn’t also, so he’s not miscast”
You: “wHaT dO yOu mEaN?!”
I kind of respect what you're going for here: try to win an argument where you are clearly outclassed and debating someone way smarter than you with a better point by acting too dumb to get simple points and being condescending and arrogant despite losing the argument all the way through. bravo lol.
People who don’t sleep through English class wouldn’t misread my post
No, it's a dumb post lol
Name someone who would be better for the part looks wise
are you saying it's hard to find someone better looking than Michael Cera? Seriously? Here's a challenge, try to find someone uglier.
I don't think Cera was miscast but if the movie was made today I don't think he would be chosen to play Scott.
Don't think the movie would work well if he was a chad either. I think for the average film goer who didn't read the comics, Cera's dweebiness makes sense in a movie about a character who's fighting Ramona's 7 evil exes and constantly comparing himself to them throughout.
He can't be a chad but he shouldn't be an ugly dweeb either. Just because he's saying he shouldn't be a dweeb doesn't mean he must necessarily be an uber-Chad either. That's a false choice. It's not one extreme or the other, there is a whole range in between.
If you disagree you haven’t read the comics. Michael Cera being Michael Cera is the opposite of Scott in temperament and personality
Part of that is Michael being cast, another part is the lack of flashbacks like the comics. Honestly someone like Evan Peters should’ve played Scott but they wanted to bank on a trendy name
Evan Peters is GREAT casting. He's have been perfect
If you disagree you haven’t read the comics. Michael Cera being Michael Cera is the opposite of Scott in temperament and personality
Part of that is Michael being cast, another part is the lack of flashbacks like the comics. Honestly someone like Evan Peters should’ve played Scott but they wanted to bank on a trendy name
I kind of respect what you're going for here: try to win an argument where you are clearly outclassed and debating someone way smarter than you with a better point by acting too dumb to get simple points and being condescending and arrogant despite losing the argument all the way through. bravo lol.
Who asked what you respect?