Moonchaser

3y

W****

PEACEFUL HARMONY

3y

Hell nah she wanna do onlyfans do it the school got all rights to fire her ass that’s unprofessional

PEACEFUL HARMONY

3y

Lol don’t cry when this country get bombed then

PEACEFUL HARMONY

3y

That what they said about pearl harbour right and Hiroshima

Malakas

3y

Didn't they ban onlyfans or some s***? Feels like it's been a while since I heard anything about that site

frenchpress

3y

it aint only about her relationship to misc. students, yeah she could avoid it pretty well with them, but she presumably has a child attending that school, and her child's friends (who she's prolly met), and those relationships complicate everything

it's just risk reduction. i highly doubt the decision was made to be personal and condemn s***work via sacrificing this woman's ability to volunteer. it's so they don't get constant emails and calls from other parents who are upset about their own child being exposed to s***(even if that woman were to hypothetically conduct herself with enough restraint to never mention her work, the other parents don't care. they see the same risk and want it gone bc it concerns their child)

and if it did lead to something bad, like bullying or children being exposed to something their parents didnt want them to know (come on bro it's onlyfans lol. this ain't how most parents gonna go about teaching birds and bees), school's gonna be f***ed

PEACEFUL HARMONY

3y

U weird as hell bro lol they doing that s*** for u

bigbelts

3y

My guy, she isn't "exposing" children to s***because she has an only fans. You acting like she is going around performing for the children.

You're doing alot of hypothetical to condemn this woman from volunteering

frenchpress

3y

anywho this makes sense for an elementary school. if it was a college then it'd be dumb bc those students are expected to at least comprehend s***work to the point where they won't get radically immature about it like literal children would (plus primary schools go to far lengths to make sure children aren't exposed to sexual material, espc. the type that onlyfans provides)

frenchpress

3y

anywho this makes sense for an elementary school. if it was a college then it'd be dumb bc those students are expected to at least comprehend s***work to the point where they won't get radically immature about it like literal children would (plus primary schools go to far lengths to make sure children aren't exposed to sexual material, espc. the type that onlyfans provides)

frenchpress

3y

nah and i never implied anything like that. it’s just as i said, it’s risk prevention bc the other parents are gonna bring up the same hypotheticals (of their children learning about s***and onlyfans, not of the woman performing for them) and should something happen, school would get a lot of criticism from their parents. schools are generally trying to avoid that

bigbelts

3y

Did you read the article? It's not risk prevention if you will still allow her to chaperone children away from the school lol

You're not stopping anyone from learning about s***by denying a s***worker the right to volunteer on campus lol if anything they exposed the children by making this a bigger deal then it is.

frenchpress

3y

yes and did you read my posts? i already agreed that everything would be fine if she was sensitive around the subject and i got no reason to assume she wouldn’t be since i don’t know her

regardless
the risk that the school is trying to prevent is both the s***thing and a bunch of complaints from parents who don’t give a s*** about any of these arguments and won’t collectively try to learn to trust this person when the easier solution in their eyes is to say nah we don’t want her volunteering cus that’s our child

Swope

3y

Parents love pointing fingers when they be f***ing on the low lmao

ARCADE GOON

3y

Ay where ya moms at?

SHAQUILLE

3y

They not posting it online tho

Mango

3y

Like 50% of the people on school boards across America have Facebook posts about murdering protesters

Swope

3y

And?