I mean you can’t blame parents for not wanting a p***star around their kids
Yes cuz she's clearly on the job when tending to her kid
Yes cuz she's clearly on the job when tending to her kid
Doesn’t matter that’s her profession
That what they said about pearl harbour right and Hiroshima
and those were both wrong
I mean why u blaming the pilot then bro he just follow orders and I’m sure that ain’t what the chief tell him but u got this from a leaked source correct?
The Nazis were just following orders too
Not mad at the school tbh. If you decide to be a mother showing her body on the internet then you gotta deal with the consequences of that. Obviously people arent going to be comfortable with you being around their kids
There’s consequences of that lifestyle this is normal
The school isn’t outta line for this
If it's a public school they should not be able to do this. Private school then they should.
The Nazis were just following orders too
Nigga comparing us to nazi lol
Nigga comparing us to nazi lol
Both have murdered innocent civillians en masse
Not mad at the school tbh. If you decide to be a mother showing her body on the internet then you gotta deal with the consequences of that. Obviously people arent going to be comfortable with you being around their kids
Anyone disagreeing saying you hate women is ludicrous bullshit. Hyper sexuality isn’t what you want around your kids.
Nah. From a school standpoint it isn't worth the s***storm that'd come from parents and donors.
Anyone disagreeing saying you hate women is ludicrous bullshit. Hyper sexuality isn’t what you want around your kids.
I expect it anyway because this site is filled with simps. But at the same time I know they wouldnt want their daughters to be onlyfans thots so they cant say s*** to me
they purposely bombed hiroshima instead of an actual military target for the purposes of testing the nuclear bomb and to put scare the soviet union by show of force
otherwise with that logic you could just bomb anywhere in a country youre at war with and assume that theres military significance
Bro you do not know history if you think Hiroshima had no military importance there at all. Same with Nagasaki. The US damn well didn’t give a f*** about the Soviet Union at the moment, if they had to worry about either scaring Japan with Atomic bombs or invading mainland Japan.
Yes those brown children getting drone striked in the middle east pose a threat to this country
I agree with you but in the eyes of supremacy, just like the lion kingdom, when the new lion is established he kills off the offspring of the prior head lion to prevent any further uprisings. Then you promise the lioness' that you'll protect them or even liberate them. You reestablish order within the new kingdom, have offsprings (political leaders, ideologies etc.) that reinforce your core values. Same s*** happens in Black America but on a more subtle level. A lot of white washed lions walking around man smh.
Bro you do not know history if you think Hiroshima had no military importance there at all. Same with Nagasaki. The US damn well didn’t give a f*** about the Soviet Union at the moment, if they had to worry about either scaring Japan with Atomic bombs or invading mainland Japan.
the US had already been in talks with Japan to force a surrender, Japan understood they had already lost, they just wanted a conditional surrender while the US leadership needed an unconditional surrender to justify the US' involvement in WWII domestically. The US' justification that they needed to end the war quickly was because they were afraid of the Soviets forcing a Japanese surrender and potentially having to split Japan with the Soviets.
"There are no innocent civilians. It is their government and you are fighting a people, you are not trying to fight an armed force anymore. So it doesn't bother me so much to be killing the so-called innocent bystanders."
-General Curtis Lemay
and in the meeting for when they were choosing what targets to hit in the Target Committee of the Manhattan Project under General Leslie Groves:
"Psychological Factors in Target Selection
A. It was agreed that psychological factors in the target selection were of great importance. Two aspects of this are (1) ovtaining the greatest psychological effect against Japan and (2) making the initial use sufficiently spectacular for the importance of the weapon to be internationally recognized when publicity on it is released.
B. In this respect Kyoto has the advantage of the people being more highly intelligent and hence better able to appreciate the significance of the weapon. Hiroshima has the advantage of being such a size and with possible focusing from nearby mountains that a large fraction of the city may be destroyed."
One of the original targets being Kyoto is inarguable proof that they had simply wanted a public demonstration of the violent capacity of the nuclear bomb, given that Kyoto was not a military target or target of importance, rather being a dense urban city and intellectual center of Japan, where many people taking refugee from the destruction of the war had been headed.
It is ahistorical to argue that geopolitics played zero part in the decision to drop the nuclear bomb on heavily populated civilian targets.
I agree with you but in the eyes of supremacy, just like the lion kingdom, when the new lion is established he kills off the offspring of the prior head lion to prevent any further uprisings. Then you promise the lioness' that you'll protect them or even liberate them. You reestablish order within the new kingdom, have offsprings (political leaders, ideologies etc.) that reinforce your core values. Same s*** happens in Black America but on a more subtle level. A lot of white washed lions walking around man smh.
ngl this is why Malcolm and Martin were killed while Farrakhan is still walking around
Nigga comparing us to nazi lol
“Hitler's concept of concentration camps as well as the practicality of genocide owed much, so he claimed, to his studies of English and United States history. He admired the camps for Boer prisoners in South Africa and for the Indians in the wild west; and often praised to his inner circle the efficiency of America's extermination—by starvation and uneven combat—of the red savages who could not be tamed by captivity.”