Reply
  • Oct 17, 2024

    It is

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ineedabaker

    im not saying my service should be the only one around. you can check this thread to see how we get into the nitty gritty.

    id love if artists were able to work on how exactly how the public streaming service would look like. this is how the government should work

    i don't see how a public digital music library would be any different from a library with books.

    the service is more so for the archival of art rather than consumption

    hmmm. maybe if you could "check out" one album at a time for a few weeks that would be way better than the current streaming set up.

  • Oct 17, 2024
    Mr Papi Nigga Dave

    Movie distributors and book publishers do it

    "tell my why i should lose money"

    "because these other morons do it"

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    Mfers don't realize if they disband streaming I'm hitting the seven seas instantly lol

  • Oct 17, 2024
    HURRY UP K DOG

    Mfers don't realize if they disband streaming I'm hitting the seven seas instantly lol

    better for the artist than streaming is

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    I hope OP at least makes music with this joke ass angle

    An artist could and should be able to say “no my music isnt free, Im not interested in your library and I’d like to be compensated while living”

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    ineedabaker

    on my public streaming service, you'd only be able to listen to the music for a certain amount of time.

    if you want to listen to the music for longer then you'd use a private streaming service/pay the artists directly

    lol if you are going to offer something for free why limit it

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    ineedabaker

    are authors broke because their books are in a library?

    alot of the are

  • Oct 17, 2024
    Mr Papi Nigga Dave

    lol if you are going to offer something for free why limit it

    Because it’s more so for archival purposes.

    Also artists need to be compensated properly

  • Oct 17, 2024
    Mr Papi Nigga Dave

    alot of the are

    That’s more so an issue with artists compensation and our society as a whole

  • Oct 17, 2024
    NGNL

    I hope OP at least makes music with this joke ass angle

    An artist could and should be able to say “no my music isnt free, Im not interested in your library and I’d like to be compensated while living”

    Artists would still be compensated.

    My service is more so for the archival of music on a grander scale with no private companies involved.

    If they don’t wanna be apart of it so be it.

    I just made a dj mix last week and it being extremely difficult to get it on YouTube/soundcloud inspired this somewhat

  • Oct 17, 2024
    rather late

    My favorite arists should be wealthy and powerful

    and go #1💅🏿

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    books still aren't free. you can checkout books, videos, and even music at a library but you have to later return it.

    there are things like Project Gutenberg where some librarians are constantly consolidating older and/or special books to be publically available for free but there is also things like that for music as well like the free music archive. Only caveat is...the work is very old.

    tldr: music, like books and all other mediums of art need to have value.

  • Oct 17, 2024
    HURRY UP TWO

    You should work for free, while also spending your own money to create a free product.

  • Oct 17, 2024
    9inetoxic

    books still aren't free. you can checkout books, videos, and even music at a library but you have to later return it.

    there are things like Project Gutenberg where some librarians are constantly consolidating older and/or special books to be publically available for free but there is also things like that for music as well like the free music archive. Only caveat is...the work is very old.

    tldr: music, like books and all other mediums of art need to have value.

    Books still have value whether they’re in a library or not.

    IMO they have even more value being in a library such that anyone is able to check it out & they’re being archived properly.

    Music would still have value if they were in a digital public music library and the artists were compensated property (pay them directly/private streaming services)

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    what about people that make income off the music, what do they now, and i dont mean the greedy corporate guys

  • Oct 17, 2024

    yea

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    So people whose job it is to make music… should do it for free?

  • Music been free lol

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Shin Chan

    So people whose job it is to make music… should do it for free?

    No. I don’t think you read my original post

    Artists would still be compensated directly or with private streaming services

    They should also archive their music such that people are able to access it for some time for free

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Wonyoungism

    what about people that make income off the music, what do they now, and i dont mean the greedy corporate guys

    In my ideal world, labels and the government would work together to make sure everyone is paid with no exploits

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    ineedabaker

    In my ideal world, labels and the government would work together to make sure everyone is paid with no exploits

    hows fifth grade brother?

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Wonyoungism

    hows fifth grade brother?

    I’m a grown ass man that still has his imagination

  • Oct 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    ineedabaker

    No. I don’t think you read my original post

    Artists would still be compensated directly or with private streaming services

    They should also archive their music such that people are able to access it for some time for free

    But who’s paying the artists if the music is free? The streaming services barely pay artists as it is

  • Oct 17, 2024

    Op dumb as f***. No I will not elaborate why