Why shouldn’t it exist? What does the absence of vulnerability that spans from, in this case, hunger or negative net value because of hunger, do thats better than the former?

bro what lmao

are you arguing for hunger as a necessity

what?

hunger will lead to not being able to concentrate in school, health problems etc

it really isn’t that hard omg

Worst take I’ve seen on this site yet

These kids aren’t being starved if they don’t pay their debt... They just get a peanut butter and jelly and some carrot sticks instead of chicken nuggets or whatever. I think you are misunderstanding what this school debt is.

There is a federal program that provides discounted or free school lunches to children based on their family’s income. The lunch debt is pretty much for kids who forgot their lunch/money. The school will just buy it for them, up to a total of just $10, at which point they provide them the basics rather than cover the bill for paid lunches... it’s not even designed to feed kids for a school week on the “debt”, let alone permanently.

“Lunch debt” is an important financial instrument that should be used to build a child’s credit score from a young age

This will help insurers price the premiums on their policies, and mortgage lenders better evaluate their loans

hunger is a necessity what the f***

uhm, what

you don’t believe hunger is a necessity for Continued existence

Are you asking me if I believe people need to experience hunger without having the ability to eat?

I’m asking if you believe that not having the security of always having a way to fulfill our hunger is beneficial to our continued existence

Ngl I'd like the small budget blade runner look we are going for

You seem confused about this in a pretty disturbing way.

When people are hungry, they shouldn't have to worry about whether or not they have food to eat, they simply should just have food to eat.

I’m not confused at all.

You are simply an advocate of utopian society.

Which, in actuality, is truly disturbing.

So you're advocating for a society where certain people don't have food, got it, thanks, now I know who not to converse with.

Not at all

But the feeling is mutual as I have no need to converse with someone that exhibits close mindedness...

"close minded" but you're the one who can't even seem to agree on the simple ass view that people should have food to eat. okaaay lmao

You’ve completely missed my point

It’s undeniable that part of the human “drive” is the need to eat

And for many this is a source of motivation, a source of tension, and a source of fulfillment

says who? you?

who says otherwise? You?

common decency. like what are you even advocating for? that people should go hungry? I don't think even you know at this point.

Bro literally what lmao

did you just use “common decency” something that isn’t very common because of its variability to argue against the evolutionary characteristics of the human species

you're trying very hard to sound smart, but can you just answer this simple question;

do you believe that people who need it have the right to food based on the simple fact they are a human being

love how that statement is brought out when facts are stated

And that is not a simple question at all but since it’s seems you are only able to gauge simplicity I’ll say I believe that humans do have the fundamental right to ACCESS food because they are human

Its weird and brutal that in United States of America young and economically average people can't barely pay for their education and health care. Its a jungle