I agree with your second point, but the existence of a "critic" as a designated position in journalism is ridiculous IMO, nobody's opinion is any more or less valid than another's just because they're a "critic"
that’s more an issue with capitalistic journalism itself than people with their opinions
that’s more an issue with capitalistic journalism itself than people with their opinions
Yes
Being a consistent artist like Kendrick or Danny Brown or being someone who protected by PC Culture.
...
You gotta make music that is enjoyed by college educated white liberals that live in Brooklyn
I mean that Megan album only has 4 reviews to be 93 overall. No doubt it would decrease massively with 20+ reviews. That being said, i havent actually listened to it, is it good?
I mean that Megan album only has 4 reviews to be 93 overall. No doubt it would decrease massively with 20+ reviews. That being said, i havent actually listened to it, is it good?
It’s not terrible, but it’s like the definition of “mid”.
It’s not terrible, but it’s like the definition of “mid”.
GOAT name
For example, this Meg album got a 90+ score on metacritic. how is this possible???
yet you got projects like FHD 2014 and Rodeo having average reviews on metacritic even though they’re loved by the public
You been killing it with these threads lately bro
Might have to crown you the KING of music section
I mean that Megan album only has 4 reviews to be 93 overall. No doubt it would decrease massively with 20+ reviews. That being said, i havent actually listened to it, is it good?