Democrats hate democracy they tell you what you should accept and call you names when you don't agree

they have a whole generation doing it

twitter.com/johnrobertsFox/status/1199051255940886528

tbh tho when i see s*** like this it does make me want to hyper-regulate the media lol

Sad to see they think we're all stupid but I've found out we're not as dumb as they think

We have to let everyone speak even if we disagree censorship is never a good idea

it's not that i necessarily believe in censorship (I do not), but I wonder at what point you must instate authoritarianism in order to protect the subversion of or transgression against civil liberties. the press is literally acting in a role to actively attempt to subvert access to the truth, or pressure organizations into taking certain positions; i.e. the NYT literally wrote an article on why we need to abolish free speech. There's an interesting question about if civil liberties of individuals could be strengthened by cracking down on the "liberties" of organizations who seek to deny such rights to begin with.

the freer the maret =/= the freer the people

plus the CIA could control what we see even more

Johne Locke is rolling around in his grave rn watching DNC tricks to take away our God given rights

People acting the like the Constitution doesn't matter anymore what the f*** is wring with people that document has made us the greatest country in history and we want to wipe or ass with it cuz millennials FEEL sad gtfo

We don't do things based on feeling were rational animals what separates us from cows

I'm aware of the paradox of tolerance but I don't believe this is the same concept, it's at best tangential to it. The paradox of tolerance is rooted in a very liberal preconceived ideology which assumes the same theoretical correctness/strength of every concept, which I already basically disagree with. That paradox is basically saying "well should x be tolerant towards the intolerant if y?"; what I'm saying is less about literal tolerance and more about the actual attempt to subvert rights/liberties through the system made available by those rights/liberties to begin with (a better comparison would be I don't believe in hate speech, but I believe in the concept of groups labeling something as hate speech in order to subvert the idea of universalized speech)

it's an interesting thought experiment as to what level of rights really are universal vs granted through constructed systems. For example, is "speech" a natural right if organizations such as the NYT can essentially pseudo-lobby for it to be banned, while simultaneously benefiting from it? While some may say "well you have the right to speech, not the right to no consequence", there's already a paradox in the idea that speech begets consequence inherently, considering that transcends the idea of speech's relative equivalence to action, if that makes sense. It's why I wonder if a strong state who's purpose was protecting such rights inherently would do a better job than a stateless solution who assumes the rights are natural without intervention

Don't see a proper way of this being regulated without it being abused, best left untouched but I get what ur saying

He’s not wrong about YouTube recommendation algorithms. Wouldn’t call changing them to not suggest more and more radical videos “censorship”

yeah ig that’s why it was never amended before !

Suggest a proper amendment without contradicting the main tenets our founding fathers suggested

I agree that it's something which would be hard because i assumes those in control share the same interests as the people, which I agree is hard when it comes to the nature of corruption in bureaucracy. But I also do feel to a degree it's something which could be worked towards to strike a balance theoretically

Y'all acting like Nicholas Cage stole the DOI for no God damn reseaon smh never forget national treasure

President Yang taking cues from President Xi and KJU

thats not what would happen bro
gootube already messes with the algorithm anyway so u dont gotta worry bout that

yea is it inherent for these ppl.. the f***

3 ways to engage the modern workforce

1. That ass

2. Those jeans

3. That ass shawty

Oh? Well what would happen then