I am? Also fairly educated on algorithms so if you actually have an opinion u should say it
I am? Also fairly educated on algorithms so if you actually have an opinion u should say it
google manipulates what is being trended. thats just a fact
remember when they were beefing with rap genius and u couldnt find their link at the top like they used to be?
didnt they just deplatform sam tripoli's podcast?
how about this
search for this exact video title with 3.1mil views and tell me how many pages it takes to find it
google manipulates what is being trended. thats just a fact
remember when they were beefing with rap genius and u couldnt find their link at the top like they used to be?
didnt they just deplatform sam tripoli's podcast?
how about this
search for this exact video title with 3.1mil views and tell me how many pages it takes to find it
Ya not disagreeing, but what does that have to do w regulating the ways they f*** with it? Like to reduce bias and radicalization?
Ya not disagreeing, but what does that have to do w regulating the ways they f*** with it? Like to reduce bias and radicalization?
well these things never stop at just one point. now, it might be an algorithm fix, when that isnt good enuff, they gon do some next s***
yang says that be wants to "rein in" polarizing news that encourages public distrust of govt.
first of all there is good reason for public distrust
who has the right to determine what is fake news
there is a lot of polarizing news
they'd rather it be about another police shooting or some s*** that isnt about corrupt govt
Suggest a proper amendment without contradicting the main tenets our founding fathers suggested
any of the amendments ?
I'm all for this. People need to limit their time on the internet. While we're at it, p*** needs to be regulated.