@op the 'Every candidate who supports M4A won their seat is a total fabrication btw
Swearengin in WV, Eastman in NE, Cisneros in CA (sort of) all supported M4A and lost
Justice Dems have a terrible win-loss record since they came into existence
https://twitter.com/oldladydem/status/1325522806642253830Also 'every candidate who supports m4a won their seat and many that didn't lost' is a bad take, center democrats are usually in more competitive areas than progressive democrats. You won't have a candidate running for super progressive policies in a Red state. You're looking for correlation that isn't there. Not saying people don't like these policies it's just a bad take
You’re describing the public option
Single payer would be abolishing private insurance entirely
and the public option is free right?
I did a whole presentation on single payer in college too lmao but I googled New Zealand it showed up as single payer when its definitely public option not single payer
Agreed. I posted this meme the other day
I just dont get it
like sure maybe medicare 4 all in the future is better for reducing inequity and etc but in the short term a public option is viable, could pass congress and will get us a lot of the way there
I just dont get it
like sure maybe medicare 4 all in the future is better for reducing inequity and etc but in the short term a public option is viable, could pass congress and will get us a lot of the way there
Pfizer just whipped up a vaccine after declining government funding. I’d say the profit motive in healthcare could be a very good thing, but we should make sure everyone has coverage and then turn it into a race for $$$. Then everyone can benefit from the competition
Not a conservative at all but I disagree with some progressive issues
For healthcare, I think we should have a public option. I don't think we need to get rid of private health insurance that 200 million people have and like. I think those who need health insurance should have an option, but if you have money you want to spend on better private care, we should allow that. Public health care isn't great for everyone. My sister has been trying to get diagnosed for ADHD in Canada and they told her they're booked for appointments until next March, and she'll have to wait. This is common in all countries that have only public healthcare
For paying off all student debt - why should the (poorer) 66% of Americans who don't go to college pay taxes that pay for the education of those who did go to college? Especially considering those who do go tend to make enough to pay it off? You're asking those who don't make as much money to pay off the college of those who are educated and get higher paying jobs. The average student debt is ~$30k. In the extreme cases, If you're spending $200k for a useless degree, that's somewhat self inflected. People go to school to become doctors/engineers/lawyers and you want uneducated people to pay off their loans? Rather than throwing money at the issue we need to look at the root of the problem, schools raising tuition because they can because they know you'll just take out a loan to deal with later, high interest rates. I don't have the perfect solution but I don't think paying off all student debt is the solution
Weed as well as most other d**** should be legal and people locked up for weed need to be free. This one should be an easy one for everyone to agree on.
A lot of progressive policies sound good at a surface level but looking at the details it quickly becomes more complicated that it sounds
Also 'every candidate who supports m4a won their seat and many that didn't lost' is a bad take, center democrats are usually in more competitive areas than progressive democrats. You won't have a candidate running for super progressive policies in a Red state. You're looking for correlation that isn't there. Not saying people don't like these policies it's just a bad take
its interesting though I feel like running progressive candidates (progressive in certain key areas - min wage, healthcare, etc) is a better option than moderates in red states
in a red state going republican lite just doesnt make sense to me
far better to actually offer something different
Manchin barely won in 2018 despite being an incumbent and swearengin is a new candidate against an incumbent
Sure she did awfully but it’s not really one that was even remotely expected to be competitive
And Cisneros won last election in a Republican district and is within 2000 votes this cycle
Yeah Cisneros barely lost so it wasn't a terrible showing by any means.
Manchin won by 3% so it wasn't a total nailbiter, same popular vote margin as Biden-Trump right now, although that'll end up a bit higher once everything is counted. Obviously the incumbency helps but I don't think it totally accounts for the difference between getting 49% of the vote and and getting 27%.
I'm not saying M4A candidates can't win in tough races or that moderates will always win, there's definitely strong M4A that can win in tight districts, I'm just saying it's not a golden ticket to winning elections like many claim
Not a conservative at all but I disagree with some progressive issues
For healthcare, I think we should have a public option. I don't think we need to get rid of private health insurance that 200 million people have and like. I think those who need health insurance should have an option, but if you have money you want to spend on better private care, we should allow that. Public health care isn't great for everyone. My sister has been trying to get diagnosed for ADHD in Canada and they told her they're booked for appointments until next March, and she'll have to wait. This is common in all countries that have only public healthcare
For paying off all student debt - why should the (poorer) 66% of Americans who don't go to college pay taxes that pay for the education of those who did go to college? Especially considering those who do go tend to make enough to pay it off? You're asking those who don't make as much money to pay off the college of those who are educated and get higher paying jobs. The average student debt is ~$30k. In the extreme cases, If you're spending $200k for a useless degree, that's somewhat self inflected. People go to school to become doctors/engineers/lawyers and you want uneducated people to pay off their loans? Rather than throwing money at the issue we need to look at the root of the problem, schools raising tuition because they can because they know you'll just take out a loan to deal with later, high interest rates. I don't have the perfect solution but I don't think paying off all student debt is the solution
Weed as well as most other d**** should be legal and people locked up for weed need to be free. This one should be an easy one for everyone to agree on.
A lot of progressive policies sound good at a surface level but looking at the details it quickly becomes more complicated that it sounds
yup!
I tried to get diagnosed with ADHD this year
first in America it was awful. unbelievably awful. psychiatrists who were bottom tier garbage and wanted me to pay thousands for tests that insurance wouldn't cover.
then New Zealand the public option would work but would take months. I paid $200 NZD out of pocket for a Skype appointment with a psychiatrist, talked for 2 hours and got diagnosed. public healthcare pays for my GP visit and prescription but having the private option let me get diagnosed within a week
its interesting though I feel like running progressive candidates (progressive in certain key areas - min wage, healthcare, etc) is a better option than moderates in red states
in a red state going republican lite just doesnt make sense to me
far better to actually offer something different
Yeah I guess we don't know. Would be interesting to see someone who's socially more conservative but has progressive policies run in one of these areas
Yeah Cisneros barely lost so it wasn't a terrible showing by any means.
Manchin won by 3% so it wasn't a total nailbiter, same popular vote margin as Biden-Trump right now, although that'll end up a bit higher once everything is counted. Obviously the incumbency helps but I don't think it totally accounts for the difference between getting 49% of the vote and and getting 27%.
I'm not saying M4A candidates can't win in tough races or that moderates will always win, there's definitely strong M4A that can win in tight districts, I'm just saying it's not a golden ticket to winning elections like many claim
oh yea I agree w you
I just think its a balance
there is absolutely merit to the idea that the dems need to embrace progressive policy in order to capture the working class that republicans are currently dominating the vote for
but the idea that just throwing a progressive candidate up there is gonna net a win is wrong. its got to be the right policies that are being targeted and the right candidate
Not a conservative at all but I disagree with some progressive issues
For healthcare, I think we should have a public option. I don't think we need to get rid of private health insurance that 200 million people have and like. I think those who need health insurance should have an option, but if you have money you want to spend on better private care, we should allow that. Public health care isn't great for everyone. My sister has been trying to get diagnosed for ADHD in Canada and they told her they're booked for appointments until next March, and she'll have to wait. This is common in all countries that have only public healthcare
For paying off all student debt - why should the (poorer) 66% of Americans who don't go to college pay taxes that pay for the education of those who did go to college? Especially considering those who do go tend to make enough to pay it off? You're asking those who don't make as much money to pay off the college of those who are educated and get higher paying jobs. The average student debt is ~$30k. In the extreme cases, If you're spending $200k for a useless degree, that's somewhat self inflected. People go to school to become doctors/engineers/lawyers and you want uneducated people to pay off their loans? Rather than throwing money at the issue we need to look at the root of the problem, schools raising tuition because they can because they know you'll just take out a loan to deal with later, high interest rates. I don't have the perfect solution but I don't think paying off all student debt is the solution
Weed as well as most other d**** should be legal and people locked up for weed need to be free. This one should be an easy one for everyone to agree on.
A lot of progressive policies sound good at a surface level but looking at the details it quickly becomes more complicated that it sounds
This is why I found Bernie being the potential nominee to be so troubling
The plans on his website were almost satirical. He would’ve gotten very little done because he & his crew are not the type to compromise
Trump was salivating running against him & honestly acted like he was campaigning against Bernie this entire election cycle even though it was Biden
Yeah I guess we don't know. Would be interesting to see someone who's socially more conservative but has progressive policies run in one of these areas
Sherrod Brown is a good example
only democrat in Ohio governance and hes the senator
pro gun control, pro breaking up Wall Street, pro public option and not necessarily against M4A
hes somewhat moderate at times but hes more progressive than several other dem senators and is winning in Ohio
Pls. all the candidates who support these programs won their elections . Pls state effective arguments against these (I don't want to be in a echo chamber so I would like to see opposite opinions or agreements)
edit:
not my stances (though I think there's some merit to their points on schooling for all & loan debt cancelation) but the traditional conservative stances on all are
Defund the police - No, we need a strong police force to guarantee our safety and law & order
M4A - Too expensive, will negatively impact R&D and innovation
Schooling for all - Turns an undergrad degree into a high school degree, doesn't fix the problem just shifts it
Debt Removal - You willingly entered into this debt, your responsibility to deal with it
Green New Deal - Too expensive & climate change is a natural occurrence that humans have little impact on
Pfizer just whipped up a vaccine after declining government funding. I’d say the profit motive in healthcare could be a very good thing, but we should make sure everyone has coverage and then turn it into a race for $$$. Then everyone can benefit from the competition
Profit motives is pick and choose on who it benifuts. We literally have an opioid crisis cause med companies wanted to shill their pills out to low income communities
Warren was the best progressive in the race
Alright now you entering back to trash terroritory from the beginning of the thread lol
not my stances (though I think there's some merit to their points on schooling for all & loan debt cancelation) but the traditional conservative stances on all are
Defund the police - No, we need a strong police force to guarantee our safety and law & order
M4A - Too expensive, will negatively impact R&D and innovation
Schooling for all - Turns an undergrad degree into a high school degree, doesn't fix the problem just shifts it
Debt Removal - You willingly entered into this debt, your responsibility to deal with it
Green New Deal - Too expensive & climate change is a natural occurrence that humans have little impact on
I love how conservatives take on global warming is just, "eh f*** it, we'll burn up cause we don't want to stop letting corporations to pollute. It's only natural."
Profit motives is pick and choose on who it benifuts. We literally have an opioid crisis cause med companies wanted to shill their pills out to low income communities
That’s why the government should provide a safety net of a public option. But, yes, just disregard my entire point lmao
yup!
I tried to get diagnosed with ADHD this year
first in America it was awful. unbelievably awful. psychiatrists who were bottom tier garbage and wanted me to pay thousands for tests that insurance wouldn't cover.
then New Zealand the public option would work but would take months. I paid $200 NZD out of pocket for a Skype appointment with a psychiatrist, talked for 2 hours and got diagnosed. public healthcare pays for my GP visit and prescription but having the private option let me get diagnosed within a week
Not adhd but bipolar, it took me over 6 months to have an appointment with my current doctor and I still have to book myself 3 months in advance minimum just to see him
It would abolish private insurance which 1.) will never get through Congress, even with a Dem majority
2.) would cost significantly more money
3.) would kick people off their private insurance, this is America, we should have a right to choose
4.) all of those people who work in the healthcare sector for private insurance would be without jobs
5.) i do not trust the government with my well-being lmao
So if there’s another way to do this without these drawbacks, it’s obviously better
And like I said, if the government provided healthcare turns out to actually be better like Bernie believes, everyone will want it and private insurance will either have to lower costs & up the quality, or it will be phased out altogether and everyone will be covered via the government provided insurance.
Every argument against m4a is some s*** like this
Im not saying its wrong but why is the fear of losing private insurance such a big deal? I ask cuz i aint ever been able to afford it
Every argument against m4a is some s*** like this
Im not saying its wrong but why is the fear of losing private insurance such a big deal? I ask cuz i aint ever been able to afford it
Because God forbid Susan or Dale has to go to the same clinic as those rude minorities!
Fiscal responsibility, yet the military is funded like 10x more than anything else.
Is it responsible when there's a whole generation of kids who can't read at their proper grade level?
Dumbest s*** ever is people pocket watching multi billion dollar businesses and being like 'No, we can't! They won't make any money!'
Defund the police is an abhorrent idea.
The rest are things that sound great on paper but aren’t financially feasible in the US
Agreed. I posted this meme the other day
This is why the convo is so annoying.
We barely got anything with the ACA which was initially a public option, hence why Bernie wanted to primary Obama.
Who told these people a single payer jump was feasible in America lmao??
How are you gonna be upset about a public option meant to phase out private insurances over time.
How are you going to trust the GOP on a single payer system when progressives barely wanna vote for this Bernie in the primaries.
The convo is ruined by demagoguery