Reply
  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    Skateboard J

    The whole “sample snitching” thing is just pure greed and selfishness. If you’re just making the song to make it then it’s w/e. But niggas think they entitled to reap the benefits while never having to give someone else their cut for using their work.

    inb4 it’s the labels and not the artists who own the samples 🤓

    Nah it’s an attack on art, sampling is needed

  • proper 🔩
    Feb 20
    xxxkiraxxx

    Was talking bout first page in general but I appreciate your irony mb

    i was the only person who mentioned music theory on the first page tho

    lol jk

    ngl tho i don’t mind sites like whosampled tho mostly
    cause im not a producer and im just a fan of music

    sometimes i just need to know what the sample in a rap song is and the only way i can find that info is w whosampled

  • saint dot edumist

    might start skipping 1st pages too tbh

    Its usually full of hot takes or engagement bait. Somebody on page 3-5 usually cares more about the topic than page 1 posters

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply

    Crazy to see the opinion change when it isn't Kanye straight up not clearing popular samples

  • Rock Mudson

    Crazy to see the opinion change when it isn't Kanye straight up not clearing popular samples

    Ye cultists not having consistent beliefs?

    Shocked

  • 2words

    The copyright laws and precedents that are used in court around this are extremely inconsistent and only singled out hip hop sampling because of its cultural origins. If it had only been Aphex Twin types sampling, then the whole legality of it would have evolved differently because they wouldn’t have went after them the same way

    Why is youtubers making content of a collage of movie footage fair use, but sampling some of a record isn’t?

    I never hear of visual artists being sued for collage art either. And it would appear that Electronic artists are way more likely to get a pass than hip hop artist. Gee I wonder why?

    The music industry panicked when sampling started and basically lobbied to get the US courts to be inconsistent with the fair use law and it worked. Sampling should absolutely be covered under fair use if you read the law. But they arbitrarily set a precedent that it doesn’t apply because THEY were greedy

    De La Soul wasn’t taking no money out of The Monkees pockets, STOP THE MADNESS

    You spitting with the question about YouTubers using movie clips. I’ve watched so many video essays about famous movies where there’s a ton of clips from the movie and those creators didn’t have to shell out a dime to the studios. Why is it that rappers have to pay up to sample a record?

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    2words

    The copyright laws and precedents that are used in court around this are extremely inconsistent and only singled out hip hop sampling because of its cultural origins. If it had only been Aphex Twin types sampling, then the whole legality of it would have evolved differently because they wouldn’t have went after them the same way

    Why is youtubers making content of a collage of movie footage fair use, but sampling some of a record isn’t?

    I never hear of visual artists being sued for collage art either. And it would appear that Electronic artists are way more likely to get a pass than hip hop artist. Gee I wonder why?

    The music industry panicked when sampling started and basically lobbied to get the US courts to be inconsistent with the fair use law and it worked. Sampling should absolutely be covered under fair use if you read the law. But they arbitrarily set a precedent that it doesn’t apply because THEY were greedy

    De La Soul wasn’t taking no money out of The Monkees pockets, STOP THE MADNESS

    It’s much deeper than trying to impress Reddit neck beard guitar center employees with your theory knowledge but niggas don’t get that so that’s why we’re here. The funny thing is the same people who would be quick to say “you should just learn theory” wouldn’t even know what to do with the Koala app if you put it in front of them and told them to chop up a sample. Duchamp gets to take a toilet seat, turn it upside down, throw it in a gallery and become an academic mainstay, but the act of sampling, the improbable origins of which are rooted in the resourcefulness of underprivileged, underrepresented black youth who didn’t have the funds to buy instruments, let alone get lessons, taking a device whose sole purpose was for the use of playing music and turning it into an instrument that became the catalyst for an entire culture and global industry is met with talentless arm chair theorist who got the nerve to tell me “it’s just a loop”

  • Feb 20
    ·
    2 replies
    SPACEGHOSTPURRP

    Nah it’s an attack on art, sampling is needed

    How is it an attack on art to give people credit when you use their work? No one is saying to stop sampling, it’s literally how hip-hop was birthed lol just don’t hide your samples or try to get away with not paying the artists whose work is being used

  • Feb 20
    ·
    2 replies
    FlyMx

    It’s much deeper than trying to impress Reddit neck beard guitar center employees with your theory knowledge but niggas don’t get that so that’s why we’re here. The funny thing is the same people who would be quick to say “you should just learn theory” wouldn’t even know what to do with the Koala app if you put it in front of them and told them to chop up a sample. Duchamp gets to take a toilet seat, turn it upside down, throw it in a gallery and become an academic mainstay, but the act of sampling, the improbable origins of which are rooted in the resourcefulness of underprivileged, underrepresented black youth who didn’t have the funds to buy instruments, let alone get lessons, taking a device whose sole purpose was for the use of playing music and turning it into an instrument that became the catalyst for an entire culture and global industry is met with talentless arm chair theorist who got the nerve to tell me “it’s just a loop”

    A lot of producers seem to have that mindset too and it's corny af. Like...niggas ain't making nothing to try and impress u or any other producer, we making s*** that sounds good. Doesn't matter if it's "just a loop" or not. Cause outside of that elitist "producer" community, nobody else gives a f*** how many times u chopped that one sample up lmao. And a lot of the times trying to force the chop is going to make it sound worse. But niggas be so scared to just leave s*** as "just a loop" cause of these niggas

  • Feb 20
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Undisclosed

    How is it an attack on art to give people credit when you use their work? No one is saying to stop sampling, it’s literally how hip-hop was birthed lol just don’t hide your samples or try to get away with not paying the artists whose work is being used

    Cause all that s*** prevents songs from coming out or modifies the original vision of the producer

    Producers don’t show the sample in the credits not in an effort to make you believe there was no sample and it was all from scratch, it’s done to avoid all the legal bs

  • Feb 20

    He's just trying to get his. This is America, are you really surprised?

  • k w 🇵🇸
    Feb 20
    sun Za

    I knew better then to step foot into this vile thread

    LMAO

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    Laced

    A lot of producers seem to have that mindset too and it's corny af. Like...niggas ain't making nothing to try and impress u or any other producer, we making s*** that sounds good. Doesn't matter if it's "just a loop" or not. Cause outside of that elitist "producer" community, nobody else gives a f*** how many times u chopped that one sample up lmao. And a lot of the times trying to force the chop is going to make it sound worse. But niggas be so scared to just leave s*** as "just a loop" cause of these niggas

    That “elitist” mentality is what gave us so many classic sample flips though…like imagine telling J Dilla or DJ Premiere they were doing too much with their flips..that’s why so many people are against the lazy sample wave we’ve been seeing because we’ve seen how producers were able to do more with less

  • Feb 20
    SignedTwice

    Cause all that s*** prevents songs from coming out or modifies the original vision of the producer

    Producers don’t show the sample in the credits not in an effort to make you believe there was no sample and it was all from scratch, it’s done to avoid all the legal bs

    “Avoid the legal BS” of paying artists for their work lol

    I’m sure Muggs wouldn’t like it if someone was making a buck off of his work without proper credit. All I’m saying

  • k w 🇵🇸
    Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply

    I think its cool to share original samples with your friends and even on niche forums (maybe) but people who make entire channels dedicated to showing everyone and their moms the original samples to songs has damaged the art form for sure. Whosampled too, as much as I use that website to find new music, it is part of the problem.

  • k w 🇵🇸
    Feb 20

    My god this thread stinks

  • Feb 20

    2words cooked you dumbasses lol

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    Undisclosed

    That “elitist” mentality is what gave us so many classic sample flips though…like imagine telling J Dilla or DJ Premiere they were doing too much with their flips..that’s why so many people are against the lazy sample wave we’ve been seeing because we’ve seen how producers were able to do more with less

    Dilla and premo were doing what they thought FELT right. That's my whole point. The elitist community be tryna force the chop and act like it's a cardinal sin to leave things as "just a loop". Both dilla and premo had beats that were just loops too. Madlib literally calls himself the loop digga lmao. A good producer knows what the sound calls for, whether that be some chops or "jUsT a LoOp"

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    k w

    I think its cool to share original samples with your friends and even on niche forums (maybe) but people who make entire channels dedicated to showing everyone and their moms the original samples to songs has damaged the art form for sure. Whosampled too, as much as I use that website to find new music, it is part of the problem.

    How are breakdown videos ruining the art form?

  • gangy 😈
    Feb 20

    Not sure what he expects his approval rating to be on this

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    Laced

    Dilla and premo were doing what they thought FELT right. That's my whole point. The elitist community be tryna force the chop and act like it's a cardinal sin to leave things as "just a loop". Both dilla and premo had beats that were just loops too. Madlib literally calls himself the loop digga lmao. A good producer knows what the sound calls for, whether that be some chops or "jUsT a LoOp"

    I get that, and some of the greatest samples ever are literally just loops (It Was A Good Day comes to mind)

    I think it’s equally as annoying to label people wanting to do more than just loops as “elitists” though is my point. I don’t think Dilla was an elitist for the way he chopped things, and I also don’t think Pooh was lazy for keeping IWAGD as just a loop

  • Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    Undisclosed

    I get that, and some of the greatest samples ever are literally just loops (It Was A Good Day comes to mind)

    I think it’s equally as annoying to label people wanting to do more than just loops as “elitists” though is my point. I don’t think Dilla was an elitist for the way he chopped things, and I also don’t think Pooh was lazy for keeping IWAGD as just a loop

    They are elitist tho because they look down on those that loop s*** up. Your perspective is that both are needed and I agree. It's balance. But a lot of people seem to get stuck on focusing on chops and acting like anything else other than that takes no talent. That's the elitist part

  • k w 🇵🇸
    Feb 20
    ·
    1 reply
    Undisclosed

    How are breakdown videos ruining the art form?

    Not everyone has to know everything, unless an artist strictly points out what they sampled or its in the writing credits, why do we need 10-20 minute videos giving out the magic?

  • Feb 20
    Laced

    They are elitist tho because they look down on those that loop s*** up. Your perspective is that both are needed and I agree. It's balance. But a lot of people seem to get stuck on focusing on chops and acting like anything else other than that takes no talent. That's the elitist part

    I agree with this 🤝

  • k w 🇵🇸
    Feb 20

    In a perfect world you would just be asked to give the original artist writing credits and a decent percentage (depending on how much money the sampling artist makes) but a lot of these artists are dead and have greedy record labels who want a ridiculous percentage, f*** that