SizzurpSteve

2y

I haven’t only through the video I mentioned. I mean sure that can be argued but just the fact a bunch of it comes off as snuff is odd to me. Just my personal opinion I mean the fact the chick gets skinned alive is wild as f*** to me. I just personally think that something like that can be problematic.

Einfinet

2y

you must also think Lolita and like half of literary classics are bad, because plenty art depicts 'bad' people and situations. I'm glad movies aren't all hollywood romance about how wonderful life is all the time

I don't understand how someone would be surprised that, out of the hundred of movies that get made each year, one was made with... a legitimate, contemporary talking point? Especially when virtual p*** seems like one of the more discussed things of the past couple years? It's not like the director went out of his way to pick some obscure concept, but, with that being said, I doubt many people have thought much about the idea of a pimp for virtual s***work. Or how pimping has transformed, in some ways, with changes in how s***is consumed. So it's a great concept to give visibility too imo

It's weird that guys are predators, yeah, especially with younger women. Not sure that its weird that people want to talk and think about and make art out of it

Sonyomom

2y

None of that is snuff tho. Her being skinned alive in that movie serves a “divine” purpose.

Seriously, why would it be?

fakerickhoodie

2y

round and brown volume 7

SizzurpSteve

2y

Uhhhhh American History X 💀

SizzurpSteve

2y

I get the message behind it how he moves on and teaches why it is bad just all the flashbacks are wild you can’t deny that

Not Like Josuke

2y

Yeah, actually haven’t seen this in like a decade. I was flipping channels and it just happened to be on like WTF

iCarly Japan2

2y

Unfortunately its still a f***ing banger tho

hoopsplayer21

2y

i think it glorified the scummy wall street persona instead of vilifying it which i think was maybe its goal.

shaleirose

2y

The Wolf of Wall Street doesn’t glorify that lifestyle at all. That’s always been one of the worst criticisms about that movie to me

hoopsplayer21

2y

for arguments sake lemme revise my point. the question was films that are problematic. i should have simply said wolf of wall street not because it glorified Jordan, but because i know for sure that it inspired a bunch of f*** boy teens to get into banking and finance because they saw jordan as being so f***ing sick. and maybe that isn’t problematic at all just wanted to clear my thinking up

hoopsplayer21

2y

for arguments sake lemme revise my point. the question was films that are problematic. i should have simply said wolf of wall street not because it glorified Jordan, but because i know for sure that it inspired a bunch of f*** boy teens to get into banking and finance because they saw jordan as being so f***ing sick. and maybe that isn’t problematic at all just wanted to clear my thinking up

IcyNeck

2y

A romanticized pedophile tale ain’t my thing. If it’s yours that’s on you. It’s something I find problematic not saying you have to agree

IcyNeck

2y

Just bc the movie goes “this isn’t good” doesn’t mean the movie is good as result.

Will never understand how ppl enjoyed a movie that central plot was grooming a young girl to become a p***star. S*** was OD weird whether the movie intended to send a message or not.

SizzurpSteve

2y

I mean snuff as in just downright vile and having it be that extreme for no reason. You’re missing the point it is bizarre lol how is it not? That’s the point of it being problematic we’re talking about problematic here.

I find that to be concerning when films like that are just gore p***. Is it not some what of a red flag? What compels somebody to make a movie that pushes that far? But gets protected cause it is just a film? Just like every other film people are pointing out in this thread they find problematic.

GIO GIO

2y

This s*** was so ass bro I was so confused