it's cause dudes are npcs and dont actually have any taste or opinions of their own so they latch onto the most popular person because they feel like it's the right thing to do and validates them
Drake
I would say those are better than clb which probably sold more?
I'm not basing how good something is on sales, I'll take large amounts of reviews any day
I think we're talking about different things i'm just talking about RYM as a metric catering to a certain type of listener
But yeah sales shouldn't be in consideration when talking about quality most, if not all times
I think we're talking about different things i'm just talking about RYM as a metric catering to a certain type of listener
But yeah sales shouldn't be in consideration when talking about quality most, if not all times
I was never not talking about sales being a bad metric, only using rym and metacritic as a better example
Idk why you thought otherwise
I was never not talking about sales being a bad metric, only using rym and metacritic as a better example
Idk why you thought otherwise
I'm specifically talking about RYM as a metric
It's like using TheNeedleDrop as a metric for whats good
When a fanbase’s favorite artist starts releasing mid albums, they have to resort to sales to show the album isn’t mid
It’s a form of coping mechanism for fans to fall back on when the music didn’t turn out good
Isnt drake known for stuff like marvins room and jungle?
Name 1 Drake song that isn’t about sales and success. I dare you.
I'm specifically talking about RYM as a metric
It's like using TheNeedleDrop as a metric for whats good
Ok that makes no sense because my initial comment very much specifies a collection of reviews, so that has nothing to do with 1 reviewer alone
And again idk how this is so hard to pick up on still but again I'm comparing only to sales being a terrible metric
Ok that makes no sense because my initial comment very much specifies a collection of reviews, so that has nothing to do with 1 reviewer alone
And again idk how this is so hard to pick up on still but again I'm comparing only to sales being a terrible metric
RYM is not a great metric unless you're a reddit poster maybe
RYM is not a great metric unless you're a reddit poster maybe
So sales is better?
Why are you so adamant in refusing to understand what I am saying
I'll listen to a rym recommendation over any sales metric any day
So sales is better?
Why are you so adamant in refusing to understand what I am saying
I'll listen to a rym recommendation over any sales metric any day
They're both not great
Isnt drake known for stuff like marvins room and jungle?
Most people don't think of Jungle when Drake is brought up.
Most people don't think of Jungle when Drake is brought up.
Its in most peoples top 5 from what ive seen
Most people don't think of Jungle when Drake is brought up.
It's in a lot of people's Top 10 songs by him of all time lol
Isn’t RYM mostly filled with those hipster types?
Their Top 10 highest rated albums have 3 Radiohead albums, 2 Kendrick albums and 2 Pink Floyd albums
Their Top 10 highest rated albums have 3 Radiohead albums, 2 Kendrick albums and 2 Pink Floyd albums
I'm not saying it's a viable way to compare music since like I said, art is subjective. I'm just saying that when it comes to competition in music, the objective facts are gonna be a***yzed similar to sports. Only objective facts in music is how much your music sells
I was watching a video about Mj/Jermaine Jackson feud and they were clowning Jermaine jackson for only going gold or something and this was in 1979 🤷🏿♂️
The KTT Thriller drop thread would’ve been hilarious
more sales ≠ better music and better rym/metacritic score ≠ better music
i think people just like talking sales cause numbers are fun
Radiohead has like 5 albums in the Top 25 of all time on RYM
anyone paying attention to the top ranked albums chart on RYM is using the site wrong
the more you drill down into specific pockets the obvious bias/stereotypical taste doesnt matter