so should people who bash christians, jews, insert any group you hate and lead cyber attacks against conservatives and centrists be banned?

Considering most people don't even get banned for bashing....anyone on twitter

and Milo was literally only banned for the y'know....leading the whole cyber attack thing to Leslie....

Do you believe that cyber bullying is a real thing?

theres already so many protected classes.

businesses cant kick you out for what ever reason they want already.

Politicians cant block people etc.
Having major platforms not be able to ban people should be a thing as well. They are almost acting as publishers. (Its different thing if its a direct call to action)
The government has made it so private water companies cant shut off water as well.

so you cant criticize people you dont like? what about people attacking people right of you?

"(Its different thing if its a direct call to action)"

so when it's a call to action....to...cyber attack....a person.

Once again, do you believe that cyber bullying is a real thing? answer the damn question. Simple yes or no.

not a call to action 💀💀

sure cyber bullying is real by definition

so it's not a call to action when you lead a cyber attack on another person.

got it.

he didnt lead a cyber attack 💀💀

call to action would be things not protected by first amendment such as me putting a hit out on you...

should businesses be able to discriminate based off of words you say so we should get rid of proected classes?

should water companies be able to discriminate against customers?

what the f*** are you talking about?

targeted harassment campaigns gets you banned from lots of places

the private business loving right-wingers arguing for nationalizing social media as a public forum

don’t you think that’s a bit USSR-ish

also right-wingers have been the ones arguing for more and more business rights and the personhood of businesses for decades

why do right-wing arguments on this specific issue not have any real points except vague gesturing at big tech even though they have the right to enforce TOS and “I DONT WANT TO GET BANNED FOR CALLING BLACK PEOPLE THE N-WORD STOPPPP”

comparing getting banned off twitter for calling ppl slurs to discrimination against marginalized groups

should private companies be able to discriminate for any reason? yes or no

Banning because you broke rules isn’t discrimination, what the f*** are you talking about?

both are the same form of government involvement.

dont avoid the question

Get involved in not being a dumbass how bout that

I’m not avoiding it, enforcing TOS does not mean discrimination.

I believe that businesses should not discriminate, however racial discrimination/hate speech is a bannable offense by most social media websites, KTT as well

So are you against companies
banning people who didnt break the rules on that platform?

Calling someone a racial slur or being a transphobe and being banned is not discrimination

Hate speech is breaking the rules, harassment is breaking the rules

However I know you and your chud kind are snickering on discord while spamming 13/50 and 1488 memes

suck my d***

So are you against companies
banning people who didnt break the rules on that platform?

People have been banned from paypal air bnb etc for stuff not on the platform

PayPal is free to ban people who exhibit hateful s***, their company does not want to be associated with bigots (for PR reasons)

So do you want companies to be able to ban people for views they dislike? yes or no

Yes, it’s entirely in their purview, that’s what you agree with when signing up with private businesses which have TOS (These are rights which conservatives have argued for, in cases of businesses discriminating on basis of race/sex)

Make your own social media platform, there’s plenty of “free speech” platforms with lots of nazis and pedophilia

So would you be okay with a company banning anyone who advocates a revolution?